↓ Skip to main content

σ-Alane Complexes of Chromium, Tungsten, and Manganese

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
σ-Alane Complexes of Chromium, Tungsten, and Manganese
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, January 2012
DOI 10.1021/ja2119892
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Photolytic ligand displacement and salt metathesis routes have been exploited to give access to κ(1) σ-alane complexes featuring Al-H bonds bound to [W(CO)(5)] and [Cp'Mn(CO)(2)] fragments, together with a related κ(2) complex of [Cr(CO)(4)]. Spectroscopic, crystallographic, and quantum chemical studies are consistent with the alane ligands acting predominantly as σ-donors, with the resulting binding energies calculated to be marginally greater than those found for related dihydrogen complexes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 38 72%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,918,734
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#8,601
of 61,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,746
of 246,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#106
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.