↓ Skip to main content

Estimates of global and regional potentil health gains from reducing muliple major risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
12 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimates of global and regional potentil health gains from reducing muliple major risk factors
Published in
The Lancet, July 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13968-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majid Ezzati, Stephen Vander Hoorn, Anthony Rodgers, Alan D Lopez, Colin D Mathers, Christopher JL Murray, the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 325 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 16%
Researcher 52 15%
Student > Master 38 11%
Other 29 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 8%
Other 89 26%
Unknown 53 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 37%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Environmental Science 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 5%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,186,789
of 29,189,333 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#8,732
of 47,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,175
of 60,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#24
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,189,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.