↓ Skip to main content

Early functional outcomes and histological analysis after spinal cord compression injury in rats.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Early functional outcomes and histological analysis after spinal cord compression injury in rats.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, January 2010
DOI 10.3171/2009.7.spine0989
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neuroprotective and repair strategies in spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have been so far largely unsuccessful. One of the prerequisites is the use of appropriate preclinical models to decipher pathophysiological mechanisms; another is the identification of optimal time windows for therapeutic interventions. The authors undertook this study to characterize early motor, sensory, autonomic, and histological outcomes after balloon compression of the spinal cord at the T8-9 level in adult rats.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2012.
All research outputs
#24,757,289
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#1,863
of 2,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,557
of 234,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.