↓ Skip to main content

The importance of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in predicting adolescent substance use

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, October 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The importance of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in predicting adolescent substance use
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, October 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00916314
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study assessed the relative importance of conduct problems and depressive symptoms, measured at two ages (11 and 15), for predicting substance use at age 15 in an unselected birth cohort of New Zealand adolescents. Among males, when the relative predictive utility of both conduct problems and depressive symptoms was assessed, only pre-adolescent depressive symptoms were found to predict multiple drug use 4 years later. No predictive relation was found between early symptomatology and later substance use among females. The strongest association between predictors and substance use emerged between age 15 multiple drug use and concurrent conduct problems for both males and females. Finally, both conduct problems and depressive symptoms at age 15 were also found to be associated with concurrent "self-medication" among females.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1996.
All research outputs
#12,446,085
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,257
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,642
of 29,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.