↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity, biodegradation and elimination of polyanhydrides

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Toxicity, biodegradation and elimination of polyanhydrides
Published in
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, October 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00052-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although originally developed for the textile industry, polyanhydrides have found extensive use in biomedical applications due to their biodegradability and excellent biocompatibility. Polyanhydrides are most commonly synthesized from diacid monomers by polycondensation. Efficient control over various physicochemical properties, such as biodegradability and biocompatibility, can be achieved for this class of polymers, due to the availability of a wide variety of diacid monomers as well as by copolymerization of these monomers. Biodegradation of these polymers takes place by the hydrolysis of the anhydride bonds and the polymer undergoes predominantly surface erosion, a desired property to attain near zero-order drug release profile. This review examines the mode of degradation and elimination of these polyanhydrides in vivo as well as the biocompatibility and toxicological aspects of various polyanhydrides.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 20%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 14%
Chemistry 33 14%
Materials Science 23 9%
Chemical Engineering 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Other 55 23%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#1,913
of 3,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,452
of 55,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.