↓ Skip to main content

Primary-care based participatory rehabilitation: users’ views of a horticultural and arts project

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Primary-care based participatory rehabilitation: users’ views of a horticultural and arts project
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2012
DOI 10.3399/bjgp12x625193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A Barley, Susan Robinson, Jim Sikorski

Abstract

Participation in horticulture and arts may improve wellbeing in those with mental and physical illness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Psychology 22 14%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Arts and Humanities 7 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#10,711,297
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,227
of 5,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,243
of 305,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.