The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Informetrics, May 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 894)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 4 blogs
twitter: 166 X users

reddit: 2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley: 77 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 169 X posts from 166 X users, with an upper bound of 583,594 followers.

RT @adfillon: En deuxième, cela favorise l’entre-soi. Et on a largement plus tendance à accepter un article de quelqu’un que l’on connait.…

En deuxième, cela favorise l’entre-soi. Et on a largement plus tendance à accepter un article de quelqu’un que l’on connait. https://t.co/5mgVUmKYfi

Oops, forgot 7. https://t.co/HHLBj34Ry7

If reviewers are closer to the authors in the collaboration network, they are more likely to accept the paper. Results like this makes me see more studies on the effect of automated reviewer assignment.

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 165 additional X posts.