↓ Skip to main content

Vaccines, biological warfare, and bioterrorism

Overview of attention for article published in Primary care, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vaccines, biological warfare, and bioterrorism
Published in
Primary care, December 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70042-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article presents a brief history of the use of biological agents in warfare and bioterrorism. Bacillus anthracis, smallpox virus, and Yersinia pestis, historically have been and currently are considered the most likely candidates for potential use under these circumstances. This article discusses the clinical syndromes these agents cause and the role of vaccines in protection against them.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Singapore 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#9,413,205
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Primary care
#196
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,769
of 184,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primary care
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them