↓ Skip to main content

What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Analysis: An International Journal, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs
Published in
Risk Analysis: An International Journal, May 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Switzerland 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 273 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 20%
Student > Master 38 13%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 45 16%
Psychology 41 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 8%
Environmental Science 20 7%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#1,547,095
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#240
of 2,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,724
of 126,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#17
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.