↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Emergency Department Concordance with Guidelines for the Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: 1999-2001 versus 2013-2015

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Changes in Emergency Department Concordance with Guidelines for the Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: 1999-2001 versus 2013-2015
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunday Clark, Krislyn M. Boggs, Diana S. Balekian, Kohei Hasegawa, Phuong Vo, Brian H. Rowe, Carlos A. Camargo, MARC-38 Investigators, Diana S. Balekian, Jon Schrock, Phuong Vo, Muhammad Waseem, Brigitte M. Baumann, Frank LoVecchio, Ava E. Pierce, Susan M. Wojcik, Theodore J. Gaeta, Gait Jordan, Daniel del Portal, Kirk A. Stiffler, Brian H. Rowe, Francis L. Counselman, Marc Afilalo, Quinn Grimes, Kirk Magee, Sunday Clark, Jerome Cephas

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,985,999
of 27,521,961 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#3,615
of 4,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,911
of 369,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#119
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,521,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.