You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ニホンジカの採食により退行した丹沢山地冷温帯自然林における植生保護柵の設置年の差異が多年生草本の回復に及ぼす影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.15.2_255 |
| Authors |
田村 淳 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 43% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 300% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 200% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 200% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,860,071
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#28
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,739
of 110,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them