↓ Skip to main content

Fat and fed: frequent use of summer torpor in a subtropical bat

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fat and fed: frequent use of summer torpor in a subtropical bat
Published in
The Science of Nature, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0606-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 66%
Environmental Science 12 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2025.
All research outputs
#12,344,283
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,100
of 2,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,350
of 138,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.