↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic instabilities and memory effects in vortex matter

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic instabilities and memory effects in vortex matter
Published in
Nature, January 2000
DOI 10.1038/35000145
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The magnetic flux line lattice in type II superconductors serves as a useful system in which to study condensed matter flow, as its dynamic properties are tunable. Recent studies have shown a number of puzzling phenomena associated with vortex motion, including: low-frequency noise and slow voltage oscillations; a history-dependent dynamic response, and memory of the direction, amplitude duration and frequency of the previously applied current; high vortex mobility for alternating current, but no apparent vortex motion for direct currents; and strong suppression of an a.c. response by small d.c. bias. Taken together, these phenomena are incompatible with current understanding of vortex dynamics. Here we report a generic mechanism that accounts for these observations. Our model, which is derived from investigations of the current distribution across single crystals of NbSe2, is based on a competition between the injection of a disordered vortex phase at the sample edges, and the dynamic annealing of this metastable disorder by the transport current. For an alternating current, only narrow regions near the edges are in the disordered phase, while for d.c. bias, most of the sample is in the disordered phase--preventing vortex motion because of more efficient pinning. The resulting spatial dependence of the disordered vortex system serves as an active memory of the previous history.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 34 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 23 59%
Engineering 4 10%
Chemistry 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,527,033
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#70,633
of 97,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,907
of 109,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#188
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.