↓ Skip to main content

Sleep Problems in Adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sleep Problems in Adolescence
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, January 1992
DOI 10.1097/00004583-199201000-00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

DIANNE N. MORRISON, ROB McGEE, WARREN R. STANTON

Abstract

A sample of 943 adolescents from the general population were questioned about sleep problems. A quarter of the sample reported needing a lot more sleep than they previously had, and 10% of the sample complained of difficulty falling asleep. Adolescents reporting sleep problems showed more anxious, depressed, inattentive, and conduct disorder behaviors than those who had no (or only occasional) sleep problems. Sleep problems, particularly multiple problems, were associated with DSM-III disorder. There were no significant differences between male and female adolescents on any of the above measures. Finally, sleep problems were relatively persistent over time from ages 13 to 15.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2010.
All research outputs
#6,274,485
of 28,723,084 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,873
of 4,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,661
of 67,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,723,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.