↓ Skip to main content

Multivalent 4-1BB binding aptamers costimulate CD8+ T cells and inhibit tumor growth in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
47 patents

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multivalent 4-1BB binding aptamers costimulate CD8+ T cells and inhibit tumor growth in mice
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, December 2007
DOI 10.1172/jci33365
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

4-1BB is a major costimulatory receptor that promotes the survival and expansion of activated T cells. Administration of agonistic anti-4-1BB Abs has been previously shown to enhance tumor immunity in mice. Abs are cell-based products posing significant cost, manufacturing, and regulatory challenges. Aptamers are oligonucleotide-based ligands that exhibit specificity and avidity comparable to, or exceeding, that of Abs. To date, various aptamers have been shown to inhibit the function of their cognate target. Here, we have described the development of an aptamer that binds 4-1BB expressed on the surface of activated mouse T cells and shown that multivalent configurations of the aptamer costimulated T cell activation in vitro and mediated tumor rejection in mice. Because aptamers can be chemically synthesized, manufacturing and the regulatory approval process should be substantially simpler and less costly than for Abs. Agonistic aptamers could therefore represent a superior alternative to Abs for the therapeutic manipulation of the immune system.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 198 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 25%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 20%
Chemistry 25 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,355,049
of 30,703,623 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#3,012
of 19,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,761
of 197,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#11
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,703,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.