↓ Skip to main content

Longest Held Job in U.S. Occupational Groups: The National Health Interview Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Longest Held Job in U.S. Occupational Groups: The National Health Interview Survey
Published in
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, January 2005
DOI 10.1097/01.jom.0000147213.76606.55
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to assess the validity of using current or most recent occupation as surrogate for longest-held job (and its exposures). The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is an annual, probability, cross-sectional U.S. population survey. The 1986 and 1988 NHIS occupational supplements provided information for more than 49,000 workers. Using Cohen's Kappa, concordance was assessed by occupational group and several subgroups. Statistically significant results were observed for all occupational groups. More than 70% of 13 broad occupations had a Kappa of 50.0 or greater, with variable concordance by subpopulation. Among 206 occupational groups, there was more variability: Kappa ranged from 92.7 (dentists) to 9.2 (farm managers). Moderate-to-high levels of agreement was observed in this large, representative sample of US workers. Therefore, current occupation can be used as a surrogate for longest-held job for many occupational subgroups.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
#2,747
of 6,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,221
of 212,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.