↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between income and health using longitudinal data from New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The relationship between income and health using longitudinal data from New Zealand
Published in
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), June 2011
DOI 10.1136/jech.2010.125021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence for a cross-sectional relationship between income and health is strong but is probably biased by substantial confounding. Longitudinal data with repeated income and health measures on the same individuals can be analysed to control completely for time-invariant confounding, giving a more accurate estimate of the impact of short-term changes in income on health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 3 6%
Canada 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 41 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Social Sciences 11 23%
Psychology 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,620,672
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#2,202
of 5,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,162
of 166,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.