You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thoracoscopic pericardiectomy associated with fully implantable catheter via thoracoscopy in the management of mesothelioma in a bitch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1292/jvms.17-0631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hellen Fialho HARTMANN, Marília Teresa DE OLIVEIRA, João Pedro Scussel FERANTI, Gabriela Pesamosca CORADINI, Stephanie Lanzarini ABATI, Bibiana Zoppas PIEREZAN, Vanessa Zanchi SARTURI, Marcella Teixeira LINHARES, Álvaro José Chávez SILVA, Francisco Miguel SÁNCHEZ-MARGALLO, Anne Santos DO AMARAL, Maurício Veloso BRUN |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1,597
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,451
of 363,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.