↓ Skip to main content

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose: senior NHS managers’ narratives of restructuring

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose: senior NHS managers’ narratives of restructuring
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01338.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The UK National Health Service (NHS) is regularly restructured. Its smooth operation and organisational memory depends on the insights and capability of managers, especially those with experience of previous transitions. Narrative methods can illuminate complex change from the perspective of key actors. We used an adaptation of Wengraf's biographical narrative life interview method to explore how 20 senior NHS managers (chief executives, directors and assistant directors) had perceived and responded to major transitions since 1974. Data were analysed thematically using insights from phenomenology, neo-institutional theory and critical management studies. Findings were contextualised within a literature review of NHS policy and management 1974-2009. Managers described how experience in different NHS organisations helped build resilience and tacit knowledge, and how a strong commitment to the 'NHS brand' allowed them to weather a succession of policy changes and implement and embed such changes locally. By synthesising these personal and situated micro-narratives, we built a wider picture of macro-level institutional change in the NHS, in which the various visible restructurings in recent years appear to have masked a deeper continuity in terms of enduring values, norms and ways of working. We consider the implications of these findings for the future NHS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,336,071
of 26,855,855 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#1,822
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,706
of 122,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,855,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.