↓ Skip to main content

Role of retroviral restriction factors in the interferon-α–mediated suppression of HIV-1 in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of retroviral restriction factors in the interferon-α–mediated suppression of HIV-1 in vivo
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1111573109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satish K. Pillai, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, John Guatelli, Mark Skasko, Alexander Monto, Katsuya Fujimoto, Steven Yukl, Warner C. Greene, Helen Kovari, Andri Rauch, Jacques Fellay, Manuel Battegay, Bernard Hirschel, Andrea Witteck, Enos Bernasconi, Bruno Ledergerber, Huldrych F. Günthard, Joseph K. Wong, J Barth, M Battegay, E Bernasconi, J Böni, HC Bucher, C Burton-Jeangros, A Calmy, M Cavassini, C Cellerai, M Egger, L Elzi, J Fehr, J Fellay, M Flepp, P Francioli, H Furrer, CA Fux, M Gorgievski, H Günthard, D Haerry, B Hasse, HH Hirsch, B Hirschel, I Hösli, C Kahlert, L Kaiser, O Keiser, C Kind, T Klimkait, H Kovari, B Ledergerber, G Martinetti, B Martinez de Tejada, K Metzner, N Müller, D Nadal, G Pantaleo, A Rauch, S Regenass, M Rickenbach, C Rudin, P Schmid, D Schultze, F Schöni-Affolter, J Schüpbach, R Speck, P Taffé, P Tarr, A Telenti, A Trkola, P Vernazza, R Weber, S Yerly

Abstract

The antiviral potency of the cytokine IFN-α has been long appreciated but remains poorly understood. A number of studies have suggested that induction of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 3 (APOBEC3) and bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST-2/tetherin/CD317) retroviral restriction factors underlies the IFN-α-mediated suppression of HIV-1 replication in vitro. We sought to characterize the as-yet-undefined relationship between IFN-α treatment, retroviral restriction factors, and HIV-1 in vivo. APOBEC3G, APOBEC3F, and BST-2 expression levels were measured in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected, antiretroviral therapy-naïve individuals before, during, and after pegylated IFN-α/ribavirin (IFN-α/riba) combination therapy. IFN-α/riba therapy decreased HIV-1 viral load by -0.921 (±0.858) log(10) copies/mL in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. APOBEC3G/3F and BST-2 mRNA expression was significantly elevated during IFN-α/riba treatment in patient-derived CD4+ T cells (P < 0.04 and P < 0.008, paired Wilcoxon), and extent of BST-2 induction was correlated with reduction in HIV-1 viral load during treatment (P < 0.05, Pearson's r). APOBEC3 induction during treatment was correlated with degree of viral hypermutation (P < 0.03, Spearman's ρ), and evolution of the HIV-1 accessory protein viral protein U (Vpu) during IFN-α/riba treatment was suggestive of increased BST-2-mediated selection pressure. These data suggest that host restriction factors play a critical role in the antiretroviral capacity of IFN-α in vivo, and warrant investigation into therapeutic strategies that specifically enhance the expression of these intrinsic immune factors in HIV-1-infected individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 31%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 11%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,131,225
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#56,525
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,912
of 256,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#428
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.