| Title |
Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems: NICE guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x676609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norma O'Flynn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 355 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 8% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 62 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 120 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,375,237
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#691
of 4,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,388
of 308,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.