↓ Skip to main content

Erratum

Overview of attention for article published in Autophagy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum
Published in
Autophagy, February 2016
DOI 10.1080/15548627.2016.1147886
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 496 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 105 21%
Researcher 56 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 50 10%
Other 26 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 3%
Other 55 11%
Unknown 190 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 111 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 7%
Neuroscience 23 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 223 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,310,658
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Autophagy
#2,052
of 2,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,301
of 298,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autophagy
#55
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.