↓ Skip to main content

Superoxide Mediated Reduction of Organically Complexed Iron(III): Comparison of Non-Dissociative and Dissociative Reduction Pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Superoxide Mediated Reduction of Organically Complexed Iron(III): Comparison of Non-Dissociative and Dissociative Reduction Pathways
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2007
DOI 10.1021/es0617892
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have investigated the mechanism of reduction of organically complexed iron(III) in the presence of superoxide, the one-electron reduced form of dioxygen that is produced in natural waters by thermal, photochemical, and biological pathways. Experimental results show that reduction of organically complexed iron(III) by superoxide may occur by either (or, in some instances, both) reaction of superoxide with inorganic iron(III) after its dissociation from the complex (dissociative reduction) or by direct reaction of superoxide with the complex (non-dissociative reduction). In the presence of low concentrations of ligands such as citrate and sulfosalicylate that bind iron(III) relatively weakly and result in complexes with high dissociation rate constants (kd > 1 x 10(-4) s(-1)), a dissociative reduction pathway dominates. However, in the presence of strong ligands or high concentrations of weak ligands, only non-dissociative reduction of complexed iron(III) occurs. The relative contribution of each pathway has major implications for the lability and hence potential bioavailablity of iron in natural waters. The simple kinetic model developed here can be used to correctly predict the superoxide-mediated formation rates of iron(II) in natural systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Professor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Other 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 31%
Chemistry 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2025.
All research outputs
#9,451,193
of 27,557,847 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#10,369
of 22,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,262
of 100,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#58
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,557,847 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.