↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Keratitis and Endophthalmitis After the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microbial Keratitis and Endophthalmitis After the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000000738
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the incidence, ocular surface disease associations, microbiological profile, and clinical course of postoperative infections after implantation of the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1). A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of the KPro-1 performed at a tertiary eye care center between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. Seventy-five KPro-1 procedures were included in the analysis. Postoperative infections occurred in 13 eyes (17.3%) with an incidence of 0.064 cases per eye-year. The Kaplan-Meier probability of an infection-free graft was 0.96, 0.90, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.86 at years 1 through 5, respectively. The rate of infections was greater in eyes with ocular surface disease (26.3% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.06), especially in those with a history of chemical or thermal injury or herpes zoster keratopathy (P = 0.001). There were 8 cases (10.7%) of microbial keratitis due to either fungi (5 cases) or bacteria (3 cases). There were 7 cases (9.3%) of endophthalmitis due to bacteria (5 cases) or intraocular extension of fungal keratitis (2 cases). The incidence of microbial keratitis and endophthalmitis was 0.034 and 0.03 cases per eye-year, respectively. Therapeutic management of the infected eyes required graft and device removal in 7 eyes (53.8%). After completion of microbiologic treatment, 7 eyes (53.8%) had lost more than 2 lines of the best-corrected preinfection visual acuity, including 5 eyes with endophthalmitis that had hand motion vision or worse. Postoperative infections are a serious issue that compromises device retention and visual outcomes after keratoprosthesis implantation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#24,121,174
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#2,036
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,174
of 338,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.