↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity of pulmonary perfusion as a mechanistic image-based phenotype in emphysema susceptible smokers

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heterogeneity of pulmonary perfusion as a mechanistic image-based phenotype in emphysema susceptible smokers
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0913880107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Engineering 12 13%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2026.
All research outputs
#5,147,370
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48,633
of 119,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,776
of 147,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#352
of 865 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 865 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.