↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis of temozolomide in animal models of glioma: was clinical efficacy predicted?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis of temozolomide in animal models of glioma: was clinical efficacy predicted?
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2012.504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 135 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2026.
All research outputs
#10,885,726
of 31,849,655 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#6,777
of 12,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,273
of 348,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#64
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,849,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.