↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical implications and clinical support for heart rate variability biofeedback for substance use disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Psychology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Theoretical implications and clinical support for heart rate variability biofeedback for substance use disorders
Published in
Current Opinion in Psychology, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Psychology
#1,241
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,685
of 364,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Psychology
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.