↓ Skip to main content

Sustained Decreases in Risk Exposure and Youth Problem Behaviors After Installation of the Communities That Care Prevention System in a Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
7 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sustained Decreases in Risk Exposure and Youth Problem Behaviors After Installation of the Communities That Care Prevention System in a Randomized Trial
Published in
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), October 2011
DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.183
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test whether the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system reduced levels of risk and adolescent problem behaviors community-wide 6 years after installation of CTC and 1 year after study-provided resources ended.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 212 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 24%
Social Sciences 34 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 62 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,951,791
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#304
of 2,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,231
of 182,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.