↓ Skip to main content

Mapping the evolutionary trajectories of morbilliviruses: what, where and whither

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Virology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 940)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mapping the evolutionary trajectories of morbilliviruses: what, where and whither
Published in
Current Opinion in Virology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.coviro.2016.01.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Morbilliviruses are pathogens of humans and other animals. Live attenuated morbillivirus vaccines have been used to end endemic transmission of measles virus (MV) in many parts of the developed world and to eradicate rinderpest virus. Entry is mediated by two different receptors which govern virus lymphotropism and epitheliotropism. Morbillivirus transmissibility is unparalleled and MV represents the most infectious human pathogen on earth. Their evolutionary origins remain obscure and their potential for adaption to new hosts is poorly understood. It has been suggested that MV could be eradicated. Therefore it is imperative to dissect barriers which restrict cross species infections. This is important as ecological studies identify novel morbilliviruses in a vast number of small mammals and carnivorous predators.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Algeria 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 41 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2025.
All research outputs
#953,032
of 28,583,110 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Virology
#40
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,530
of 317,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Virology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,583,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.