↓ Skip to main content

Radical‐Induced Hydrosilylation Reactions for the Functionalization of Two‐Dimensional Hydride Terminated Silicon Nanosheets

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radical‐Induced Hydrosilylation Reactions for the Functionalization of Two‐Dimensional Hydride Terminated Silicon Nanosheets
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/chem.201505134
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Herein we present the functionalization of silicon nanosheets (SiNSs) via radical-induced hydrosilylation reactions. An efficient hydrosilylation of Si-H terminated SiNSs can be achieved by thermal initiation or the addition of diazonium salts with a variety of alkene or alkyne derivatives. The radical-induced hydrosilylation is applicable for a wide variety of substrates with different functionalities, improving the stability and dispersibility of the functional SiNSs in organic solvents and potentially opening up new fields of application for these hybrid materials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 39%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 39%
Chemical Engineering 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#24,753,303
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#20,012
of 29,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,753
of 337,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#236
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,575 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.