↓ Skip to main content

Limited carbon and biodiversity co‐benefits for tropical forest mammals and birds

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Limited carbon and biodiversity co‐benefits for tropical forest mammals and birds
Published in
Ecological Applications, June 2016
DOI 10.1890/15-0935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia Beaudrot, Kailin Kroetz, Patricia Alvarez‐Loayza, Ieda Amaral, Thomas Breuer, Christine Fletcher, Patrick A. Jansen, David Kenfack, Marcela Guimarães Moreira Lima, Andrew R. Marshall, Emanuel H. Martin, Mireille Ndoundou‐Hockemba, Timothy O'Brien, Jean Claude Razafimahaimodison, Hugo Romero‐Saltos, Francesco Rovero, Cisquet Hector Roy, Douglas Sheil, Carlos E.F. Silva, Wilson Roberto Spironello, Renato Valencia, Alex Zvoleff, Jorge Ahumada, Sandy Andelman

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#9,176,928
of 27,629,830 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,034
of 3,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,152
of 322,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#48
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,629,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.