↓ Skip to main content

ASSESSING FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS OF JUICES AND JUICE-FLAVORED DRINKS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), July 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ASSESSING FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS OF JUICES AND JUICE-FLAVORED DRINKS
Published in
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), July 1996
DOI 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0347
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Few studies have investigated fluoride exposures from juices and juice-flavored drinks manufactured with water. In this study, the authors analyzed 532 juices and juice drinks for fluoride. Fluoride ion concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 2.80 parts per million, in part because of variations in fluoride concentrations of water used in production. Children's ingestion of fluoride from juices and juice-flavored drinks can be substantial and a factor in the development of fluorosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,646,910
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#747
of 3,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,641
of 40,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.