↓ Skip to main content

Bell miner associated dieback: nutrient cycling and herbivore crown damage in Eucalyptus propinqua

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Forestry, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 169)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bell miner associated dieback: nutrient cycling and herbivore crown damage in Eucalyptus propinqua
Published in
Australian Forestry, January 2016
DOI 10.1080/00049158.2015.1123565
Authors

Peter Nageli, J. Grant, J.D. Nichols, D. Sheil, B. Horton

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Environmental Science 2 18%
Psychology 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Australian Forestry
#19
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,010
of 402,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Forestry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.