↓ Skip to main content

Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012101
Authors

David J Keene, Mark A Williams, Anand H Segar, Christopher Byrne, Sarah E Lamb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 31%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,125
of 313,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.