↓ Skip to main content

Nurses' perceptions and experiences of work role transitions: a mixed methods systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nurses' perceptions and experiences of work role transitions: a mixed methods systematic review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/jan.12912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Arrowsmith, Margaret Lau-Walker, Ian Norman, Jill Maben

Abstract

To understand nurses' perceptions and experiences of work role transitions. Globally an uncertain healthcare landscape exists and when changing work roles nurses experience periods of transition when they may not cope well. A greater understanding of work role transitions may help facilitate workforce retention and successful careers. Mixed methods systematic review. Six data bases were searched for peer reviewed primary empirical research, published in English language between January 1990 and December 2014, supplemented by hand and citation searching. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre methods for systematic reviews principles were followed. Analysis and synthesis of the qualitative and quantitative papers was conducted separately using thematic analysis. A third synthesis combined the narrative findings and a narrative synthesis of results is presented. Twenty-six papers were included. Across nurses' work role transitions two pathways were found: Novice and Experienced. 'Novice' comprises pre-registration and newly qualified nurses. 'Experienced' comprises, Enrolled/Licensed Practical Nurse to Registered Nurse, experienced to specialist nurse and clinical role changes. Each pathway results in different emphasizes of two themes; 'Striving for a new professional self' includes emotional upheaval and identity while 'Know how' includes competence and boundaries. Novice nurses are more susceptible to the extremes of emotional upheaval while experienced nurses' competence eases aspects of transitions while boundary issues pervade. Informed work and educational environments are required for all groups of nurses. Using existing models of transition can facilitate successful individual transitions and develop the workplace.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 72 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 59 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 73 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,540,525
of 29,915,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#955
of 7,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,898
of 317,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#50
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,915,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.