↓ Skip to main content

RGD-K5 PET/CT in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: Results from a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RGD-K5 PET/CT in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: Results from a pilot study
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00259-016-3345-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We prospectively investigated the potential usefulness of PET using a new tracer targeting integrin αvβ3 (termed RGD-K5) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced HNC scheduled for definitive CCRT were eligible. RDG-K5 PET and FDG PET scans were performed at three different time points (baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-treatment). Nine patients completed all of the three scans, whereas two patients withdrew after two scans only. Uptake of both RGD-K5 and FDG generally decreased following CCRT. However, the observed decrease did not differ significantly between complete responders and non-responders. At 3 months post-treatment, the uptake of both RGD-K5 and FDG at the main tumors was significantly lower in those who achieved complete responses than in those with residual tumors. RGD-K5 PET has the potential to identify patients with incomplete responses to CCRT.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,610
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,608
of 299,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#40
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.