↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive evaluation of buccal respiratory chain enzyme dysfunction in mitochondrial disease: Comparison with studies in muscle biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-invasive evaluation of buccal respiratory chain enzyme dysfunction in mitochondrial disease: Comparison with studies in muscle biopsy
Published in
Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.11.193
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Making a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease (MD) is extremely challenging and often employs the analysis of respiratory complex (RC) activities in biopsied skeletal muscle. Given both the invasive nature and expense of biopsied-muscle based testing for mitochondrial defects, buccal swab enzyme analysis has been explored as an alternative approach to the more invasive muscle biopsy. Case studies have recently suggested that buccal swabs from patients can be used to accurately assess mitochondrial enzyme activities including RC I and RC IV using a dipstick methodology combined with spectrophotometric analysis. In this study, forty patients with suspected MD who have previously been found to have significant defects in either RC I or RC IV in skeletal muscle were assessed by buccal swab analysis and compared to enzyme values obtained with unaffected controls (n=106) in the same age range. Buccal citrate synthase was used as an indicator of overall mitochondrial content, correlating well with overall buccal mitochondrial frataxin levels and was found to be elevated above control levels in 28% of the patients in this cohort. Of 26 cases with significant muscle RC I deficiency, 20 displayed significantly reduced levels of buccal RC I activity. All 7 of the patients with muscle RC IV deficiency showed significant buccal RC IV defect and 6 of the 7 patients with combined defects in muscle RC I and IV activity levels also exhibited analogous deficiencies in both buccal RC I and RC IV activities. In conclusion, the relatively high correlation (over 82%) of buccal and muscle RC deficiencies further supports the validity of this non-invasive approach as a potentially useful tool in the diagnosis of MD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2025.
All research outputs
#11,979,090
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#1,233
of 2,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,885
of 302,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.