↓ Skip to main content

Moderating role of the MAOA genotype in antisocial behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
6 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Moderating role of the MAOA genotype in antisocial behaviour
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.093328
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent studies have examined gene×environment (G×E) interactions involving the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene in moderating the associations between exposure to adversity and antisocial behaviour. The present study examined a novel method for assessing interactions between a single gene and multiple risk factors related to environmental and personal adversity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 225 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 30 13%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 85 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 20%
Unspecified 30 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 94 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,238,775
of 34,318,950 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,696
of 7,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,177
of 496,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,216
of 5,898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,318,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.