↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of SIRT1 in aging: Roles in mitochondrial function and biogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Mechanisms of Ageing & Development, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of SIRT1 in aging: Roles in mitochondrial function and biogenesis
Published in
Mechanisms of Ageing & Development, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.mad.2016.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aging is a degenerative process associated with cumulative damage, which leads to cellular dysfunction, tissue failure, and disorders of body function. Silent information regulator-1, also known as Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), has been reported to be involved in the regulation of various important biological processes, including inflammation, mitochondrial biogenesis, as well as cell senescence and consequent aging. The level of SIRT1 is decreased in both transcriptional and postranscriptional conditions during aging, accompanied by attenuated mitochondrial biogenesis, an important component of aging-related diseases. Over the last decade, extensive studies have demonstrated that SIRT1 can activate several transcriptional factors, such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) resulting in ameliorated mitochondria biogenesis and extended life span. In this review, we focus on the molecular regulation of SIRT1 and its role in mitochondrial biogenesis during in the context of aging and aging-related diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 11 5%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 69 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 82 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2025.
All research outputs
#10,239,176
of 33,918,391 outputs
Outputs from Mechanisms of Ageing & Development
#760
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,387
of 336,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mechanisms of Ageing & Development
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,918,391 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.