↓ Skip to main content

Part 8: Advanced Life Support

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
googleplus
1 Google+ user
guideline
6 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Part 8: Advanced Life Support
Published in
Circulation, October 2010
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.110.971051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurie J. Morrison, Charles D. Deakin, Peter T. Morley, Clifton W. Callaway, Richard E. Kerber, Steven L. Kronick, Eric J. Lavonas, Mark S. Link, Robert W. Neumar, Charles W. Otto, Michael Parr, Michael Shuster, Kjetil Sunde, Mary Ann Peberdy, Wanchun Tang, Terry L. Vanden Hoek, Bernd W. Böttiger, Saul Drajer, Swee Han Lim, Jerry P. Nolan, Christophe Adrie, Mohammed Alhelail, Pavan Battu, Wilhelm Behringer, Lauren Berkow, Richard A. Bernstein, Sadiq S. Bhayani, Blair Bigham, Jeff Boyd, Barry Brenner, Eric Bruder, Hermann Brugger, Ian L. Cash, Maaret Castrén, Michael Cocchi, Gregory Comadira, Kate Crewdson, Michael S. Czekajlo, Suzanne R. Davies, Harinder Dhindsa, Deborah Diercks, C. Jessica Dine, Csaba Dioszeghy, Michael Donnino, Joel Dunning, Nabil El Sanadi, Heather Farley, Peter Fenici, V. Ramana Feeser, Jane A.H. Foster, Hans Friberg, Michael Fries, F. Javier Garcia-Vega, Romergryko G. Geocadin, Marios Georgiou, Jaspinder Ghuman, Melissa Givens, Colin Graham, David M. Greer, Henry R. Halperin, Amanda Hanson, Michael Holzer, Elizabeth A. Hunt, Masami Ishikawa, Marios Ioannides, Farida M. Jeejeebhoy, Paul A. Jennings, Hitoshi Kano, Karl B. Kern, Fulvio Kette, Peter J. Kudenchuk, Douglas Kupas, Giuseppe La Torre, Todd M. Larabee, Marion Leary, John Litell, Charles M. Little, David Lobel, Timothy J. Mader, James J. McCarthy, Michael C. McCrory, James J. Menegazzi, William J. Meurer, Paul M. Middleton, Allan R. Mottram, Eliano Pio Navarese, Thomas Nguyen, Marcus Ong, Andrew Padkin, Edison Ferreira de Paiva, Rod S. Passman, Tommaso Pellis, John J. Picard, Rachel Prout, Morten Pytte, Renee D. Reid, Jon Rittenberger, Will Ross, Sten Rubertsson, Malin Rundgren, Sebastian G. Russo, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Claudio Sandroni, Tommaso Sanna, Tomoyuki Sato, Sudhakar Sattur, Andrea Scapigliati, Richard Schilling, Ian Seppelt, Fred A. Severyn, Greene Shepherd, Richard D. Shih, Markus Skrifvars, Jasmeet Soar, Keiichi Tada, Sara Tararan, Michel Torbey, Jonathan Weinstock, Volker Wenzel, Christoph H. Wiese, Daniel Wu, Carolyn M. Zelop, David Zideman, Janice L. Zimmerman

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 282 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 38 13%
Student > Postgraduate 38 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Master 27 9%
Other 86 28%
Unknown 51 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Engineering 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,283,273
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,308
of 27,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,748
of 146,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#20
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.