↓ Skip to main content

Using an interlaboratory study to revise methods for conducting 10‐d to 42‐d water or sediment toxicity tests with Hyalella azteca

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using an interlaboratory study to revise methods for conducting 10‐d to 42‐d water or sediment toxicity tests with Hyalella azteca
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/etc.3417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris D. Ivey, Chris G. Ingersoll, William G. Brumbaugh, Edward J. Hammer, Dave R. Mount, J. Russell Hockett, Teresa J. Norberg‐King, Dave Soucek, Lisa Taylor

Abstract

Studies have been conducted to refine USEPA, ASTM, and Environment Canada standard methods for conducting 42-d reproduction tests with H. azteca in water or in sediment. Modifications to the H. azteca method include better defined ionic composition requirements for exposure water (i.e., >15 mg/L of chloride and >0.02 mg/L of bromide) and improved survival, growth and reproduction with alternate diets provided as increased rations over time in water-only or whole-sediment toxicity tests. A total of 24 laboratories volunteered to participate in an inter-laboratory study evaluating the performance of H. azteca in 42-d studies in control sand or control sediment using the refined methods. Improved growth and reproduction of H. azteca was observed with 2 alternate diets of (1) ramped diatoms (Thalassiosira weissflogii) + ramped Tetramin or (2) Yeast-cerophyl-trout chow (YCT) + ramped Tetramin, especially when compared to results from the traditional diet of 1.8 mg YCT/day. Laboratories were able to meet proposed test acceptability criteria (TAC) and in most cases had lower variation in growth or reproduction compared to previous inter-laboratory studies using the traditional YCT diet. Laboratory success in conducting 42-d H. azteca exposures benefitted from adherence to several key requirements of the detailed testing, culturing, and handling method. Results from this inter-laboratory study are being used to help revise standard methods for conducting 10- to 42-d water or sediment toxicity exposures with H. azteca. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#5,118
of 5,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,896
of 369,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#137
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.