↓ Skip to main content

心因性運動障害患者への理学療法の経験

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy Japan, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
心因性運動障害患者への理学療法の経験
Published in
Physical Therapy Japan, October 2018
DOI 10.15063/rigaku.kj00003125884
Authors

若有 治美, 才藤 栄一, 保坂 隆, 神内 拡行, 田中 博, 寺川 ゆかり

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#151
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,765
of 363,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.