You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors for Mortality in Pediatric Postsurgical versus Medical Severe Sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Surgical Research, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajan K. Thakkar, Scott L. Weiss, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Luke Keele, Neal J. Thomas, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Jennifer A. Muszynski, Mark W. Hall, P. Fontela, M. Tucci, M. Dumistrascu, P. Skippen, G. Krahn, E. Bezares, G. Puig, A. Puig-Ramos, R. Garcia, M. Villar, M. Bigham, T. Polanski, S. Latifi, D. Giebner, H. Anthony, J. Hume, A. Galster, L. Linnerud, R. Sanders, G. Hefley, K. Madden, A. Thompson, S. Shein, S. Gertz, Y. Han, T. Williams, A. Hughes-Schalk, H. Chandler, A. Orioles, E. Zielinski, A. Doucette, A. Orioles, E. Zielinski, A. Doucette, C. Zebuhr, T. Wilson, C. Dimitriades, J. Ascani, S. Layburn, S. Valley, B. Markowitz, J. Terry, R. Morzov, A. Mcinnes, J. McArthur, K. Woods, K. Murkowski, M. Spaeder, M. Sharron, D. Wheeler, E. Beckman, E. Frank, K. Howard, C. Carroll, S. Nett, D. Jarvis, V. Patel, R. Higgerson, L. Christie, K. Typpo, J. Deschenes, A. Kirby, T. Uhl, K. Rehder, I. Cheifetz, S. Wrenn, K. Kypuros, K. Ackerman, F. Maffei, G. Bloomquist, N. Rizkalla, D. Kimura, S. Shah, C. Tigges, F. Su, C. Barlow, K. Michelson, K. Wolfe, D. Goodman, L. Campbell, L. Sorce, K. Bysani, T. Monjure, M. Evans, B. Totapally, M. Chegondi, C. Rodriguez, J. Frazier, L. Steele, S. Viteri, A. Costarino, N. Thomas, D. Spear, E. Hirshberg, J. Lilley, C. Rowan, C. Rider, J. Kane, J. Zimmerman, C. Greeley, J. Lin, R. Jacobs, M. Parker, K. Culver, L. Loftis, N. Jaimon, M. Goldsworthy, J. Fitzgerald, S. Weiss, V. Nadkarni, J. Bush, M. Diliberto, C. Allen, M. Gessouroun, A. Sapru, T. Lang, M. Alkhouli, S. Kamath, D. Friel, J. Daufeldt, D. Hsing, C. Carlo, S. Pon, J. Scimeme, A. Shaheen, A. Hassinger, H. Qiao, J. Giuliano, J. Tala, D. Vinciguerra, A. Fernandez, R. Carrero, P. Hoyos, J. Jaramillo, A. Posada, L. Izquiierdo, B.E. Piñeres Olave, J. Donado, R. Dalmazzo, S. Rendich, L. Palma, M. Lapadula, C. Acuna, P. Cruces, S. Clement De Clety, M. Dujardin, C. Berghe, S. Renard, J. Zurek, H. Steinherr, K. Mougkou, E. Critselis, K. Mougkou, M. Di Nardo, S. Picardo, F. Tortora, E. Rossetti, T. Fragasso, P. Cogo, R. Netto, A. Dagys, V. Gurskis, R. Kevalas, C. Neeleman, J. Lemson, C. Luijten, K. Wojciech, I. Pagowska-Klimek, M. Szczepanska, J. Karpe, P. Nunes, H. Almeida, J. Rios, M. Vieira, J. P. Garcia Iniguez, P. Revilla, J. Urbano, J. Lopez-Herce, A. Bustinza, A. Palacios, S. Hofheinz, A. Rodriguez-Nunez, S. Sanagustin, E. Gonzalez, M. Riaza, R. Piaya, P. Soler, E. Esteban, J. Laraudogoitia, C. Monge, V. Herrera, J. Granados, C. Gonzalez, T. Koroglu, E. Ozcelik, P. Baines, A. Plunkett, P. Davis, S. George, S. Tibby, J. Harris, R. Agbeko, R. Lampitt, J. Brierley, M. Peters, A. Jones, T. Dominguez, T. Thiruchelvam, A. Deep, L. Ridley, W. Bowen, R. Levin, I. Macleod, M. Gray, N. Hemat, J. Alexander, S. Ali, J. Pappachan, J. McCorkell, P. Fortune, M. MacDonald, P. Hudnott, Q. Suyun, S. Singhi, K. Nallasamy, R. Lodha, N. Shime, Y. Tabata, O. Saito, T. Ikeyama, T. Kawasaki, L. Lum, A. Abidin, S. Kee, S. Tang, R. Jalil, Y. Guan, L. Yao, K. Lin, J. Ong, A. Salloo, L. Doedens, L. Mathivha, G. Reubenson, S. Moaisi, A. Pentz, R. Green, A. Schibler, A. Fernandez, S. Erickson, J. McEneiry, D. Long, T. Dorofaeff, M. Coulthard, J. Millar, C. Delzoppo, G. Williams, M. Morritt, N. Watts, M. Morritt, J. Beca, C. Sherring, T. Bushell |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,067,960
of 27,999,580 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#3,455
of 6,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,010
of 368,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#37
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,999,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.