↓ Skip to main content

Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: The Grey Zone of Neurotrauma

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: The Grey Zone of Neurotrauma
Published in
Neurocritical Care, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12028-016-0253-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Moderate traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is poorly defined in the literature and the nomenclature "moderate" is misleading, because up to 15 % of such patients may die. MTBI is a heterogeneous entity that shares many aspects of its pathophysiology and management with severe traumatic brain injury. Many patients who ''talk and died'' are MTBI. The role of neuroimaging is essential for the proper management of these patients. To analyze all aspects of the pathophysiology and management of MTBI, proposing a new way to categorize it considering the clinical picture and neuroimaging findings. We proposed a different approach to the group of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ranging from 9 through 13 and we discuss the rationale for this proposal. Patients with lower GCS scores (9-10), especially those with significant space-occupying lesions on the CT scan, should be managed following the guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury, with ICU observation, frequent serial computed tomography (CT) scanning and ICP monitoring. On the other hand, those with higher range GCS (11-13) can be managed more conservatively with serial neurological examination and CT scans. Given the available evidence, MTBI is an entity that needs reclassification. Large-scale and well-designed studies are urgently needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 33%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Psychology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 48 40%