↓ Skip to main content

Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: The patient experience

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Infection Control, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: The patient experience
Published in
American Journal of Infection Control, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been adequately documented, the patient experience of undergoing FMT has not. We carried out a qualitative interview study using semistructured questions relating to aspects of health pre-FMT, during FMT, and post-FMT periods with 17 participants. Inductive coding was used to identify core themes during the periods. Pre-FMT themes included physical (continuous diarrhea and weight loss), mental (depression, wanting to die, and fear), quality of life (unable to perform normal activities), social support, and financial (medication costs) factors. Provider resistance/limited awareness were barriers to FMT. Participants reached a tipping point, experiencing feelings of hopelessness, which led them to pursue FMT. During FMT, participants commented on lack of a so-called ick factor. During the posttreatment period, participants experienced symptom relief, but had residual fears. Patient activation was present during all phases, including information seeking and empowerment. During the pre-FMT period, participants experienced extreme discomfort and encountered FMT barriers. Undergoing FMT was reported as easy but residual fear remained. There were displays of patient activation at all FMT time periods, including the seeking of FMT. Participants could have benefited from having undergone FMT sooner, demonstrating a need for improvement in provider education and health system barriers regarding FMT.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Psychology 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,299,422
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Infection Control
#716
of 4,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,482
of 318,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Infection Control
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.