↓ Skip to main content

Reporting Guidelines and Checklists Improve the Reliability and Rigor of Research Reports.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reporting Guidelines and Checklists Improve the Reliability and Rigor of Research Reports.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2016.0105
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) requires the use of robust research reporting guidelines for all research report submissions, including the newly adopted RECORD (REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data) statement. We remind authors submitting research to JOSPT to identify the appropriate guideline and checklist for their study design, and to submit a completely and accurately completed checklist with their manuscript. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(3):130. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.0105.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,344,094
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2,166
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,206
of 336,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.