↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in secondary care

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in secondary care
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, February 2012
DOI 10.1177/0004867412437345
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (CCBT) with a wait list control (WLC) for the treatment of patients with an anxiety disorder (social phobia, panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder) referred to a specialist, publically funded, outpatient anxiety service.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,200,083
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#366
of 2,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,492
of 262,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.