↓ Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
89 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djz073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quisette P Janssen, Stefan Buettner, Mustafa Suker, Berend R Beumer, Pietro Addeo, Philippe Bachellier, Nathan Bahary, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Maria A Bali, Marc G Besselink, Brian A Boone, Ian Chau, Stephen Clarke, Mary Dillhoff, Bassel F El-Rayes, Jessica M Frakes, Derek Grose, Peter J Hosein, Nigel B Jamieson, Ammar A Javed, Khurum Khan, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Song Cheol Kim, Sunhee S Kim, Andrew H Ko, Jill Lacy, Georgios A Margonis, Martin D McCarter, Colin J McKay, Eric A Mellon, Sing Yu Moorcraft, Ken-Ichi Okada, Alessandro Paniccia, Parag J Parikh, Niek A Peters, Hans Rabl, Jaswinder Samra, Christoph Tinchon, Geertjan van Tienhoven, Eran van Veldhuisen, Andrea Wang-Gillam, Matthew J Weiss, Johanna W Wilmink, Hiroki Yamaue, Marjolein Y V Homs, Casper H J van Eijck, Matthew H G Katz, Bas Groot Koerkamp

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 15 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 86 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 95 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#475,226
of 34,200,840 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#318
of 9,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,099
of 396,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,200,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.