↓ Skip to main content

On the sensitivity of IMRT dose optimization to the mathematical form of a biological imaging-based prescription function

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Medicine & Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
On the sensitivity of IMRT dose optimization to the mathematical form of a biological imaging-based prescription function
Published in
Physics in Medicine & Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Voxel-based prescriptions of deliberately non-uniform dose distributions based on molecular imaging, so-called dose painting or theragnostic radiation therapy, require specification of a transformation that maps the image data intensities to prescribed doses. However, the functional form of this transformation is currently unknown. An investigation into the sensitivity of optimized dose distributions resulting from several possible prescription functions was conducted. Transformations between the radiotracer activity concentrations from Cu-ATSM PET images, as a surrogate of tumour hypoxia, and dose prescriptions were implemented to yield weighted distributions of prescribed dose boosts in high uptake regions. Dose escalation was constrained to reflect clinically realistic whole tumour doses and constant normal tissue doses. Optimized heterogeneous dose distributions were found by minimizing a voxel-by-voxel quadratic objective function in which all tumour voxels were given equal weight. Prescriptions based on a polynomial mapping function were found to be least constraining on their optimized plans, while prescriptions based on a sigmoid mapping function were the most demanding to deliver. A prescription formalism that fixed integral dose was less sensitive to errors in the choice of the mapping function than one that boosted integral dose. Integral doses to normal tissue and critical structures were insensitive to the shape of the prescription function. Planned target dose conformity improved with smaller beamlet dimensions until the inherent spatial resolution of the functional image was matched. Clinical implementation of dose painting depends on advances in absolute quantification of functional images and improvements in delivery techniques over smaller spatial scales.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Physics and Astronomy 9 20%
Engineering 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#9,390,309
of 27,377,461 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#1,835
of 6,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,090
of 201,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#19
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,377,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.