You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid Microsatellite Identification from Illumina Paired-End Genomic Sequencing in Two Birds and a Snake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todd A. Castoe, Alexander W. Poole, A. P. Jason de Koning, Kenneth L. Jones, Diana F. Tomback, Sara J. Oyler-McCance, Jennifer A. Fike, Stacey L. Lance, Jeffrey W. Streicher, Eric N. Smith, David D. Pollock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sudan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 257 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 26% |
| Researcher | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 200 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,254,489
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,807
of 221,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,383
of 258,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#804
of 3,560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.